4.4 Article

Longitudinal associations in adolescence between cortisol and persistent aggressive or rule-breaking behavior

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 93, Issue 1, Pages 132-137

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.01.002

Keywords

Antisocial behavior; Aggression; Cortisol; Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis; Adolescence; Longitudinal

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research [GB-MAGW 480-03-005, GB-MAGW 480-08-006, GB-MAGW 400-05-212]
  2. Stichting Achmea Slachtoffer en Samenleving (SASS)
  3. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research
  4. VU University Amsterdam
  5. Utrecht University
  6. Foundation De Drie Lichten in the Netherlands

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although several studies have associated antisocial behavior with decreased cortisol awakening responses (CAR), studies in adolescent samples yielded inconsistent results. In adolescence however, the CAR develops and antisocial behavior is heterogeneous in type and persistence. Therefore this longitudinal study compared persistent aggressive and rule-breaking adolescents to low aggressive and rule-breaking adolescents on the development of the CAR from ages 15 to 17 (N=390). Persistently high aggressive adolescents showed decreased cortisol levels at awakening consistently over the years (Delta chi(2)(1) = 6.655, p = .01) as compared to low aggressive adolescents. No differences between adolescents showing persistent high rule-breaking and low rule-breaking were found. This longitudinal study is the first to show that persistent aggression, but not rule-breaking behavior, is related to neurobiological alterations. Moreover, despite development of the CAR over adolescence, the decrease in cortisol is consistent over time in persistent high aggressive adolescents, which is an important prerequisite for the prediction of persistent aggression. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available