4.6 Article

Evidence for selectivity of absorption of volatile organic compounds by a polydimethylsiloxane solid-phase microextraction fibre

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 885, Issue 1-2, Pages 457-464

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9673(00)00109-6

Keywords

solid-phase microextraction; selectivity; polydimethylsiloxane fibres; volatile organic compounds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Solid-phase microextraction using a 30 mu m polydimethylsiloxane fibre has been used to sample the volatile organic compounds from standard mixtures and from mixtures produced by the decomposition of organic compounds. This method of sampling has been compared with the direct injection of an aliquot of headspace gas and shows an enrichment factor of approximately 100 over a 1 ml gas injection for organosulphur gases such as dimethyldisulphide. The performance of the fibre has been evaluated with respect to accuracy and precision at several concentrations in representing the composition of multicomponent mixtures. It was found that the presence of a second component in a gas sample reduced the capacity of the fibre to absorb the primary component. The selectivity of the fibre for various volatile compounds with differing functionality was also studied. It was found that the non-polar polydimethylsiloxane fibre preferentially absorbed the non-polar components of a mixture, e.g nonane and, correspondingly, under reported the more polar components, e.g. ethanol. Hence, the fibre discriminates in favour of non-polar and against polar components in a mixture in comparison with direct analysis of a headspace sample. Thus, quantitation of a component in a multi-component mixture is liable to error from competitive interference from other components. A major advantage of the technique, however, is that it does not absorb, and therefore introduce, water into the analytical system. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available