4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

The first galaxies: structure and stellar populations

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2000.0626

Keywords

early Universe; evolution; morphology; stellar content; galaxies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Hubble deep fields (HDFs) continue to be a valuable resource for studying the distant Universe, particularly at z > 2 where their comoving volume becomes large enough to encompass several hundred L* galaxies or their progenitors. Here, I present recent results from a near-infrared (NIR) imaging survey of the HDF-north with the Near Infrared Camera and Multi-Object Spectrograph (NICMOS), which provides structural and photometric information in the optical rest frame (lambda lambda(0)4000-5500 Angstrom) for hundreds of 'ordinary' galaxies at 2 < z < 3, and which offers the means to search for still-more-distant objects at z much greater than 5. Lyman-break galaxies (LBGs) at 2 < z < 3 are compact and often irregular in the NICMOS images; ordinary Hubble sequence spirals and ellipticals seem to be largely absent at these redshifts, and apparently reached maturity at 1 < z < 2. The LBGs have ultraviolet (UV)-optical spectral energy distributions like those of local starburst galaxies. Population synthesis models suggest typical ages of a few x 10(8) years and moderate UV extinction (ca. 1.2 mag at 1700 Angstrom), but the constraints are fairly weak and there may be considerable variety. Considering an NIR selected galaxy sample, there is little evidence for a significant number of galaxies at z similar to 3 that have been missed by UV-based Lyman-break selection. Using the well-characterized z similar to 3 galaxy population as a point of reference, I consider LEG candidates at 4.5 < z < 9, as well as one remarkable object that might (or might not) be an LEG at z > 12. The space density of UV-bright galaxies in the HDF appears to thin out toward larger redshifts, although surface-brightness selection effects may play an important role.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available