4.7 Article

Far-ultraviolet spectroscopy of Venus and Mars at 4 Å resolution with the Hopkins Ultraviolet Telescope on astro-2

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 538, Issue 1, Pages 395-400

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/309125

Keywords

molecular processes; planets and satellites : individual (Mars, Venus); ultraviolet : solar system

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Far-ultraviolet spectra of Venus and Mars in the range 820-1840 Angstrom at similar to 4 Angstrom resolution were obtained on 1995 March 13 and 12, respectively, by the Hopkins Ultraviolet Telescope (HUT), which was part of the Astro-2 observatory on the space shuttle Endeavaur. Longward of 1250 Angstrom, the spectra of both planets are dominated by emission of the CO fourth positive (A(1)Pi-X (1)Sigma(+)) band system and strong O I and C I multiplets. In addition, CO Hopfield-Birge bands, B(1)Sigma(+)-X(1)Sigma(+) (0, 0) at 1151 Angstrom and C(1)Sigma(+)-X(1)Sigma(+) (0, 0) at 1088 Angstrom, are detected for the first time, and there is a weak indication of the E(1)Pi-X(1)Sigma(+) (0,0) band at 1076 Angstrom in the spectrum of Venus. The B-X band is blended with emission from O I lambda 1152. Modeling the relative intensities of these bands suggests that resonance fluorescence of CO is the dominant source of the emission, as it is for the fourth positive system. Shortward of Ly alpha, other emission features detected include O II lambda 834, O I lambda 989, H I Ly beta, and N I lambda lambda 1134 and 1200. For Venus, the derived disk brightnesses of the O I, O II, and H I features are about one-half of those reported by Herd et al. from Galileo EW measurements made in 1990 February. This result is consistent with the expected variation from solar maximum to solar minimum. The Ar r lambda lambda 1048, 1066 doublet is detected only in the spectrum of Mars, and the derived mixing ratio of Ar is of the order of 2%, consistent with previous determinations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available