4.4 Article

Effects of stress on heart rate complexity-A comparison between short-term and chronic stress

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 80, Issue 3, Pages 325-332

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.11.005

Keywords

Heart rate variability; Non-linear; Correlation dimension; Chronic stress; Short-term stress stressor

Funding

  1. NIH [HL36005, RR00827]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined chronic and short-term stress effects on heart rate variability (HRV), comparing time, frequency and phase domain (complexity) measures in 50 healthy adults. The hassles frequency subscale of the combined hassles and uplifts scale (CHUS) was used to measure chronic stress. Shortterm stressor reactivity was assessed with a speech task. HRV measures were determined via surface electrocardiogram (ECG). Because respiration rate decreased during the speech task (p < .001), this study assessed the influence of respiration rate changes on the effects of interest. A series of repeated-measures analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) with Bonferroni adjustment revealed that short-term stress decreased HR D2 (calculated via the pointwise correlation dimension PD2) (p < .001), but increased HR mean (p < .001), standard deviation of R-R (SDRR) intervals (p < .001), low (LF) (p < .001) and high frequency band power (HF) (p = .009). Respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) and LF/HF ratio did not change under short-term stress, Partial correlation adjusting for respiration rate showed that HR D2 was associated with chronic stress (r = -.35, p = .019). Differential effects of chronic and short-term stress were observed on several HRV measures, HR D2 decreased under both stress conditions reflecting lowered functionality of the cardiac pacemaker. The results confirm the importance of complexity metrics in modern stress research on HRV. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available