4.2 Article

Isolation and purification of lymphocyte subsets from gut-associated lymphoid tissue in neonatal swine

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS
Volume 241, Issue 1-2, Pages 185-199

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1759(00)00209-X

Keywords

mucosal; neonatal pig; lymphocyte isolation; developmental immunology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The characterization of lymphoid subsets isolated from different anatomical sites is of great importance for understanding the mechanisms and interactions of normal and pathological immune reactions in the pig. The objective of this study was to standardize a protocol for the isolation of lymphocytes from mucosal tissues of neonatal pigs. Specific protocols for the isolation of lymphocytes from Peyer's patches of jejunum (jejPP) and ileum (ilPP), the Intraepithelial (IE) and lamina propria (LP) compartments of the jejunum and ileum the mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN), and the peripheral blood (PBMC) are described in detail. The analysis of the cells isolated indicated a high viability (>90%). The histological sections from fragments collected from the intestine demonstrated that in nursing young pigs, the recovery of IE and LP lymphocytes may be limited because of the low numbers of lymphocytes present in early age. In addition, the presence of large intracytoplasmic vacuoles and hyaline droplets between the columnar epithelial cells during the first week of age interferes with the isolation of pure lymphocytes from the IE and LP compartments. Optimal lymphocyte yields for all the samples analyzed was confirmed by immunostaining with the pan-lymphocyte marker, CD45. The successful isolation and comparison of large numbers of pure populations from compartmentalized areas of the intestine and associated lymphoid tissues opens up a broad area for the investigation of mucosal immune responses of pigs. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available