4.5 Article

Termination of recent-onset atrial fibrillation/flutter in the emergency department: a sequential approach with intravenous ibutilide and external electrical cardioversion

Journal

RESUSCITATION
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages 181-187

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0300-9572(00)00180-5

Keywords

atrial fibrillation/flutter; electrical cardioversion; emergency department; intravenous ibutilide; safety

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Safety and effectiveness are the goals in treating patients with arrhythmias. In an open prospective study, we observed the efficacy and safety of up to 2 mg intravenous ibutilide, a new class III antiarrhythmic agent in haemodynamically stable patients presenting in the emergency department (ED) with symptoms of recent-onset (< 48 h) atrial fibrillation/flutter. Arrhythmia termination within 90 min, haemodynamic parameters and proarrhythmic effects were assessed. Non-responders to the ibutilide infusion underwent external electrical cardioversion. We included 51 patients. In 31 patients therapeutic intervention with intravenous ibutilide was successful within 90 min (61%). In another seven patients conversion to sinus rhythm occurred after 90 min without any other intervention (14%). Blood pressure remained stable and no relevant proarrhythmic effects were observed. The 13 patients who did not respond to ibutilide treatment underwent successful external electrical cardioversion. The overall conversion rate was 100%. Forty-seven patients (92%) were discharged within a median of 9 h and managed as outpatients. In conclusion, in haemodynamically stable patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation/flutter intravenous ibutilide and external electrical cardioversion for conversion to sinus rhythm turned out to be effective and safe. The short duration of admission makes this strategy attractive for use in the ED. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available