4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Glutamine transport in C6 glioma cells

Journal

NEUROCHEMISTRY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 37, Issue 2-3, Pages 139-146

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0197-0186(00)00017-6

Keywords

glutamine transport; C6 cells; system ASC; system N; system L

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glutamine transport across the cell membranes of a variety of mammalian tissues is mediated by at least four transport systems: a sodium-independent system L, and sodium-dependent systems A, ASC and N, the latter occurring in different tissue-specific variants. In this study we assessed the contribution of these systems to the uptake of [H-3]glutamine in C6 rat glioma cells. The sodium-dependent uptake, which accounted for more than 80% of the total uptake, was not inhibited by 2-methylaminoisobutyric acid (MeAIB), indicating that system A was inactive, possibly being depressed by glutamine present in the culture medium. About 80% of the sodium-dependent uptake was mediated by system ASC, which differed from system ASC common to other CNS- and non-CNS tissues by its pH-dependence and partial lithium tolerance. The residual 20% of sodium-dependent uptake appeared to be mediated by system N, which was identified as a component resistant to inhibition by MeAIB + threonine. The system N in CS cells appeared to be neither fully compatible with the neuronal system Nb, nor with the N system described in astrocytes: it differed from the former in being strongly inhibited by histidine and showing fair tolerance for lithium, and from the latter in its pH-insensitivity and strong inhibition by glutamate. The sodium-independent glutamine uptake differed from the astrocytic or neuronal uptake in its relatively weak inhibition by system L substrates and a strong inhibition by system ASC substrates, indicating a possible contribution of a variant of the ASC system. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available