4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Tumor doubling times in metastatic malignant melanoma of the uvea -: Tumor progression before and after treatment

Journal

OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 107, Issue 8, Pages 1443-1449

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00182-2

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To obtain estimates of growth rate of metastatic uveal melanoma to infer appropriate follow-up programs and to assess the impact of current chemoimmunotherapy regimens. Design: Retrospective case series. Participants: Of 70 consecutive patients diagnosed with metastatic uveal melanoma from 1986 through 1998, 37 patients who attended regular follow-up and had measurable metastases were eligible for this study. Methods: Tumor doubling time (DT) was calculated by the Schwartz formula using three presumed sizes of metastasis at last negative follow-up. Di was compared according to tumor characteristics, and time of micrometastasis was estimated, Main Outcome Measures: Doubling time of untreated and treated metastases, Results: Doubling time of untreated metastases ranged from 34 to 220 days (median, 63 days). Regardless of the presumed size of metastasis at last screening, two thirds of the metastases had a DT between 30 and 80 days. No significant correlation between DT and the observed disease-free interval was detected. Assuming constant growth rate, most metastases had predictably initiated within 5 years before primary treatment. Mean DT during active treatment of metastases in 18 patients who did not show an objective response ranged from 25 to 2619 days (median, 255 days). Conclusions: Based on the estimated growth rates, a rational follow-up interval to detect metastatic uveal melanoma would be 4 to 6 months. Primary uveal melanomas that develop clinically detectable metastasis after conservative therapy may micrometastasize several years before treatment. These estimates are rough and must be confirmed by prospective studies. Current chemoimmunotherapy regimens slow down the growth rate of metastases even if objective response is not obtained. Ophthalmology 2000;107:1443-1449 (C) 2000 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available