4.7 Article

Vocal Acoustic Biomarkers of Depression Severity and Treatment Response

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 72, Issue 7, Pages 580-587

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.03.015

Keywords

Depression assessment; interactive voice response (IVR); methodology; speech; telephone; voice acoustics

Funding

  1. Pfizer, Inc.
  2. National Institute of Mental Health Small Business Innovation Research Grant [R44 MH068950]
  3. Glaxo SmithKline
  4. Pfizer
  5. Eli Lilly
  6. Eisai
  7. National Institutes of Health
  8. US Department of Agriculture
  9. National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia) [10012302]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Valid, reliable biomarkers of depression severity and treatment response would provide new targets for clinical research. Noticeable differences in speech production between depressed and nondepressed patients have been suggested as a potential biomarker. Methods: One hundred five adults with major depression were recruited into a 4-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled research methodology study. An exploratory objective of the study was to evaluate the generalizability and repeatability of prior study results indicating vocal acoustic properties in speech may serve as biomarkers for depression severity and response to treatment. Speech samples, collected at baseline and study end point using an automated telephone system, were analyzed as a function of clinician-rated and patient-reported measures of depression severity and treatment response. Results: Regression models of speech pattern changes associated with clinical outcomes in a prior study were found to be reliable and significant predictors of outcome in the current study, despite differences in the methodological design and implementation of the two studies. Results of the current study replicate and support findings from the prior study. Clinical changes in depressive symptoms among patients responding to the treatments provided also reflected significant differences in speech production patterns. Depressed patients who did not improve clinically showed smaller vocal acoustic changes and/or changes that were directionally opposite to treatment responders. Conclusions: This study supports the feasibility and validity of obtaining clinically important, biologically based vocal acoustic measures of depression severity and treatment response using an automated telephone system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available