4.7 Article

1H-[13C]-Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Measures of Ketamine's Effect on Amino Acid Neurotransmitter Metabolism

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 71, Issue 11, Pages 1022-1025

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.11.006

Keywords

GABA; glutamate/glutamine cycle; ketamine; magnetic resonance spectroscopy; medial prefrontal cortex; NMDA

Funding

  1. National Institute of Mental Health [R01 MH081211, 1R01 MH095104]
  2. Merck Co., Inc.
  3. Abbott
  4. AstraZeneca
  5. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  6. Evotec
  7. Eli Lilly Co.
  8. Hoffman La-Roche
  9. Johnson Johnson
  10. Novartis
  11. Novum Pharmaceuticals
  12. Merck Co.
  13. Sunovion Pharmaceuticals

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ketamine has recently gained significant attention owing to its psychotomimetic and more recently discovered rapid antidepressant-like properties. H-1-[C-13]-nuclear magnetic resonance studies were employed to explore potential physiological processes underlying these unique effects. [1-C-13] glucose and [2-C-13] acetate-nuclear magnetic resonance ex vivo studies were performed on the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and hippocampus of rats acutely treated with 30 mg/kg or 80 mg/kg ketamine and compared with saline-treated animals to determine the effects of ketamine on amino acid neurotransmitter cycling and glial metabolism. A subanesthetic, but not anesthetic, dose of ketamine significantly increased the percentage of C-13-enrichments of glutamate, gamma-aminobutyric acid, and glutamine in the mPFC of rats. Subanesthetic doses of ketamine increased mPFC amino acid neurotransmitter cycling, as well as neuronal and glial energy metabolism. These data add to previous reports suggesting increased mPFC levels of glutamate release, following the administration of subanesthetic doses of ketamine, are related to the drug's acute effects on cognition, perception, and mood.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available