4.7 Article

Cingulate, Frontal, and Parietal Cortical Dysfunction in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 69, Issue 12, Pages 1160-1167

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.01.022

Keywords

ADHD; attention; cingulate; cognition; decision; frontal; imaging; parietal; reward

Funding

  1. Centers for Disease Control
  2. National Institutes of Mental Health
  3. National Science Foundation
  4. Mental Illness and Neuroscience Discovery (MIND) Institute
  5. National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression (NARSAD)
  6. Benson-Henry Institute for Mind-Body Medicine at Massachusetts General Hospital
  7. David Judah Fund
  8. McIngvale Fund
  9. Johnson and Johnson Center for the Study of Psychopathology
  10. Center for Functional Neuroimaging Technologies [P41RR14075]
  11. McNeil Pharmaceuticals
  12. Pfizer Pharmaceuticals
  13. Eli Lilly and Company

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Functional and structural neuroimaging have identified abnormalities of the brain that are likely to contribute to the neuropathophysiology of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). In particular, hypofunction of the brain regions comprising the cingulo-frontal-parietal cognitive-attention network have been consistently observed across studies. These are major components of neural systems that are relevant to ADHD, including cognitive/attention networks, motor systems, and reward/feedback-based processing systems. Moreover, these areas interact with other brain circuits that have been implicated in ADHD, such as the default mode resting state network. The ADHD imaging data related to cingulo-frontal-parietal network dysfunction will be selectively highlighted here to help facilitate its integration with the other information presented in this special issue. Together, these reviews will help shed light on the neurobiology of ADHD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available