4.5 Article

Characterization of T cell clones derived from lymph nodes and lungs of Pseudomonas aeruginosa-susceptible and resistant mice following immunization with heat-killed bacteria

Journal

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 121, Issue 2, Pages 275-282

Publisher

BLACKWELL SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2000.01222.x

Keywords

Pseudomonas aeruginosa; T cell clones; specificity; cytokines; lungs

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pseudomonas aeruginosa-resistant BALB/c and susceptible C57Bl/6 (B6) mice were immunized with heat-killed Pseudomonas either in the foot pad or via the trachea, and panels of Pseudomonas-specific T cell clones were developed from lymph nodes and lungs. All clones from either strain, whether of lymph node or lung origin, were CD3(+)CD4(+)CD8(-)TCR alpha beta(+). The efficacy of cloning from lymph node cells was comparable between BALB/c and B6 mice. All lymph node BALB/c clones proliferated in response to Pseudomonas antigen in a dose-dependent manner, and this response was MHC class II-restricted. Vigorous proliferation by a considerable proportion of B6 T cell clones occurred in the absence of specific antigen. Lymph node clones from either strain could be categorized as either Th1 or Th0 on the basis of interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma)/IL-4 production. In either mouse strain the efficacy of cloning from lung tissue was substantially lower than from lymph nodes, but the efficacy of cloning from BALB/c compared with B6 lungs was higher. Four lung T cell clones from BALB/c and two from B6 mice were expanded for further analyses, and an interstrain difference was observed in cytokine production. Both B6 lung T cell clones were Th1-like and produced IFN-gamma but not IL-4 and IL-10, whereas four BALB/c lung T cell clones were Th2-like and produced IL-4 and IL-10 but not IFN-gamma. These observations suggest that differences in the CD4(+) Th response in the lung may contribute to differences among inbred mouse strains in the level of resistance to bronchopulmonary Pseudomonas infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available