4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

EUS-guided injection of cyanoacrylate for bleeding gastric varices

Journal

GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
Volume 52, Issue 2, Pages 168-174

Publisher

MOSBY, INC
DOI: 10.1067/mge.2000.107911

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Bleeding gastric varices is a highly fatal condition. Recurrent bleeding after hemostasis achieved by endoscopic methods is common, and obliteration of gastric varices is difficult to assess. Our aim was to investigate the use of endosonography (EUS) in monitoring cyanoacrylate injection to obliterate gastric varices. Methods: Patients who presented with bleeding gastric varices were treated with bolus injection(s) of cyanoacrylate (0.5 mL cyanoacrylate mixed with 0.7 mL Lipiodol) until bleeding was controlled; 47 patients received on-demand injection only in response to recurrent bleeding (on-demand group). Another group of 54 patients underwent biweekly EUS followed by repeated injection of cyanoacrylate (repeated-injection group) until all gastric varices were obliterated. The primary outcome was recurrent bleeding-free interval and survival rate. Results: The two groups of patients were comparable demographically. Although the rates of early (less than or equal to 48 hour) bleeding recurrence were similar with repeated or on-demand injection (7.4% versus 12.8%, p = 0.5), late recurrence of bleeding (>48 hour) was significantly reduced in the repeated-injection group (18.5% versus 44.7%, p = 0.0053, odds ratio 0.28 (95% CI [0.12, 0.69]). Cumulative probability of recurrent bleeding-free interval was higher in the repeated-injection than the on-demand group (log-rank test, p = 0.0053). There was a numeric trend toward improved survival in the repeated-injection group. Conclusion: Gastric varices obliteration with cyanoacrylate under EUS monitoring reduces recurrent bleeding and may improve survival.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available