4.7 Article

The Risk of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder After Trauma Depends on Traumatic Load and the Catechol-O-Methyltransferase Val158Met Polymorphism

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 67, Issue 4, Pages 304-308

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.10.009

Keywords

COMT polymorphism; genetic polymorphisms; post-traumatic stress disorder; refugees; risk

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG)
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [PP00P3-123391, GRSIK0_122691, PP00P3-114813]
  3. European Science Foundation
  4. University of Konstanz
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PP00P3_123391] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The risk for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) depends on the number of traumatic event types experienced in a dose-response relationship, but genetic factors are known to also influence the risk of PTSD. The catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) Val158Met polymorphism has been found to affect fear extinction and might play a role in the etiology of anxiety disorders. Methods: Traumatic load and lifetime and current diagnosis of PTSD and COMT genotype were assessed in a sample of 424 survivors of the Rwandan Genocide living in the Nakivale refugee camp in southwestern Uganda. Results: Higher numbers of different lifetime traumatic event types led to a higher prevalence of lifetime PTSD in a dose-response relationship. However, this effect was modulated by the COMT genotype: whereas Val allele carriers showed the typical dose-response relationship, Met/Met homozygotes exhibited a high risk for PTSD independently of the severity of traumatic load. Conclusions: The present findings indicate a gene-environment interaction between the human COMT Val158Met polymorphism and the number of traumatic event types experienced in the risk of developing PTSD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available