4.5 Article

Residues 1-20 of IRBP and whole IRBP elicit different uveitogenic and immunological responses in interferon gamma deficient mice

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL EYE RESEARCH
Volume 71, Issue 2, Pages 111-118

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1006/exer.2000.0860

Keywords

autoimmune disease; interphotoreceptor retinoid binding-protein interferon-gamma; uveitis; cosinophils

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis (EAU) is a T-cell-mediated autoimmune disease induced by immunization with uveitogenic retinal antigens, or by the adoptive transfer of uveitogenic T-cells of the Th-l-like phenotype. We have previously shown that IFN-gamma-deficient mice (GKO) on the C57BL/6 background are equally susceptible to interphotoreceptor retinoid binding protein (IRBP)-induced EAU as the wild type (WT). In the present study, we evaluated EAU induction in GKO mice by the newly described 11-2(b) epitope contained in residues 1-20 of human IRBP, and compared it to the response to the whole IRBP molecule. Similarly to previous observations with IRBP-induced EAU, delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) and lymphocyte proliferation responses were elevated in GKO mice, as was production of IL-5 and TNF-alpha. However unlike the responses induced by whole IRBP, there was no delectable IL-IO production to the peptide. Histopathology on day 21 after immunization. revealed that both GKO and WT mice developed retinal lesions, including damage to the photoreceptor cell layer, vasculitis and inflammatory cellular infiltration, but disease scores were significantly higher in GKO, and retinal detachment was observed only in GKO mice. In contrast to the wild type, the cellular infiltrate in eyes of GKO mice contained a prominent component of eosinophils, although of lower proportion in peptide-induced than in IRBP-induced EAU. We conclude that the cytokine and inflammatory responses to human peptide 1-20 differ perceptibly from the responses to whole bovine IRBP, and may explain the elevated EAU scores of GKO mice compared to wild type.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available