4.7 Article

Chromosome mosaicism in day 3 aneuploid embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts in vitro

Journal

HUMAN REPRODUCTION
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages 1781-1786

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/15.8.1781

Keywords

aneuploidy; blastocyst; chromosomal mosaicism; embryo biopsy; inner cell mass cells

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In all, 143 human embryos obtained 3 days (day 3) after insemination or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) were biopsied and a single nucleated cell removed for identification of aneuploidy by fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) for chromosomes X, Y, 13, 16, 18 and 21, Fifty-one per cent of embryos were aneuploid and significantly more aneuploid embryos blocked in further development to morulae and blastocysts than euploid embryos (59 versus 34%; P < 0.001). Chromosomal analysis of the generated blastocysts revealed 40% were aneuploid (16 of 40 generated blastocysts). Re-examination of cells by FISH for the same chromosome probes of the inner cell mass (ICM) of expanded and hatching blastocysts derived from the aneuploid embryos revealed a high incidence of mosaicism of ICM cell lineages that were usually predictable from observations of day 3 single-cell biopsies, These data would not support the hypothesis of a preferential allocation of euploid cells to the ICM and aneuploid cells to the trophectoderm, A high concordance between day 3 aneuploidy diagnosis and ICM cell lineages was observed with trisomies (97%), and multiple complex chromosome numerical abnormalities (100%), A reduced concordance was observed with monosomies (65%) and haploidy (18%), Concomitantly, the proportion of ICM cell lineages was increased in blastocysts whose chromosomal condition was diagnosed as haploid (21%) or with complex numerical abnormalities (50%).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available