4.7 Article

Neural Hyporesponsiveness and Hyperresponsiveness During Immediate and Delayed Reward Processing in Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 65, Issue 1, Pages 7-14

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.07.008

Keywords

ADHD; amygdala; attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; delay aversion; fMRI; striatum

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [KFO 125]
  2. Sonderforschungsbereich (SFB)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Dysfunctional reward processing, accompanied by a limited ability to tolerate reward delays, has been proposed as an important feature in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Methods: Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), brain activation in adult patients with ADHD (n = 14) and healthy control subjects (n = 12) was examined during a series of choices between two monetary reward options that varied by delay to delivery. Results: Compared with healthy control subjects, hyporesponsiveness of the ventral-striatal reward system was replicated inpatients with ADHD and was evident for both immediate and delayed rewards. In contrast, delayed rewards evoked hyperactivation in dorsal caudate nucleus and amygdala of ADHD patients. In both structures, neural activity toward delayed rewards was significantly correlated with self-rated ADHD symptom severity. Conclusions: The finding of ventral-striatal hyporesponsiveness during immediate and delayed reward processing in patients with ADHD further strengthens the concept of a diminished neural processing of rewards in ADHD. Hyperactivation during delayed reward processing, gradually increasing along the ventral-to-dorsal extension of the caudate nucleus, and especially the concomitant hyperactivation of the amygdala are in accordance with predictions of the delay aversion hypothesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available