4.7 Article

A Line of Mice Selected for High Blood Ethanol Concentrations Shows Drinking in the Dark to Intoxication

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 65, Issue 8, Pages 662-670

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.11.002

Keywords

DID; ethanol consumption; genetic animal models; HDID; intoxication; mouse; pharmacogenetics; selective breeding

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health and by the Department of Veterans Affairs [AA010760, AA013478, AA013519]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Many animal models of alcoholism have targeted aspects of excessive alcohol intake (abuse) and dependence. In the rodent, models aimed at increasing alcohol self-ad ministration have used genetic or environmental manipulations, or their combination. Strictly genetic manipulations (e.g., comparison of inbred strains or targeted mutants, selective breeding) have not yielded rat or mouse genotypes that will regularly and voluntarily drink alcohol to the point of intoxication. Although some behavioral manipulations (e.g., scheduling or limiting access to alcohol, adding a sweetener)will induce mice or rats to drink enough alcohol to become intoxicated, these typically require significant food or water restriction or a long time to develop. We report progress toward the development of a new genetic animal model for high levels of alcohol drinking. Methods: High Drinking in the Dark (HDID-1) mice have been selectively bred for high blood ethanol concentrations (BEC, ideally exceeding 100 mg%) resulting from the ingestion of a 20% alcohol solution. Results: After 11 generations of selection, more than 56% of the population now exceeds this BEC after a 4-hour drinking session in which a single bottle containing 20% ethanol is available. The dose of ethanol consumed also produced quantifiable signs of intoxication. Conclusions: These mice will be useful for mechanistic studies of the biological and genetic contributions to excessive drinking.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available