4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Capillary isotachophoretic determination of flufenamic, mefenamic, niflumic and tolfenamic acid in pharmaceuticals

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 135-142

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0731-7085(00)00283-1

Keywords

flufenamic acid; mefenamic acid; niflumic acid; tolfenamic acid; isotachophoresis; pharmaceutical analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Anionic capillary isotachophoresis (ITP) with conductimetric detection has been used for determining selected non-steroid anti-inflammatory and analgesic drugs of the phenamate group. namely tolfenamic (I), flufenamic (II), mefenamic (III) and niflumic (IV) acid. Initially the pK(a) values (proton lost) of I-IV were determined as 5.11, 4.91, 5.39 and 4.31, respectively, by the UV spectrophotometry in aqueous 50% (w/w) methanol. The optimised ITP electrolyte system consisted of 10 mM HCl + 20 mM imidazole (pH 7.1) as the leading electrolyte and 10 mM 5,5'-diethylbalbituric acid (pH 7.5) as the terminating electrolyte. The driving and detection currents were 100 mu A (for 450 s) and 30 mu A, respectively (a single analysis took about 20 min). Under such conditions the effective mobilities of I-IV varied between 23.6 and 24.6 m(2) V-1 s(-1) (evaluated with orotic acid as the mobility standard). The calibration graphs relating the ITP zone length to the concentration of the analytes were rectilinear (r = 0.9987-0.9999) in the range 10-100 mg l(-1) of the drug standard. The R.S.D.s were 0.96-1.55% (n = 6) when determining 50 mg l(-1) of the analytes in pure test solutions. The method has been applied to the assay of the phenamates in six commercial mass-produced pharmaceutical preparations (Mobilisin gel and ointment, Lysalgo capsules, Nifluril cream, Niflugel gel, and Clotam capsules). According to the validation procedure based on the standard addition technique the recoveries were 98.4-104.3% of the drug and the R.S.D, values were 1.25-3.32% (n = 6). (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available