4.6 Article

Relation of weight gain and weight loss on subsequent diabetes risk in overweight adults

Journal

JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH
Volume 54, Issue 8, Pages 596-602

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jech.54.8.596

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Study objective-To determine whether long term weight gain and weight loss are associated with subsequent risk of type 2 diabetes in overweight, non-diabetic adults. Design-Prospective cohort. Baseline overweight was defined as BMI greater than or equal to 27.3 for women and BMI greater than or equal to 27.8 for men. Annual weight change (kg/year) over 10 years was calculated using measured weight at subjects' baseline and first follow up examinations. In the 10 years after measurement of weight change, incident cases of diabetes were ascertained by self report, hospital discharge records, and death certificates. Setting-Community. Participants-1929 overweight, non-diabetic adults. Main results-Incident diabetes was ascertained in 251 subjects. Age adjusted cumulative incidence increased from 9.6% for BMI<29 to 26.2% for BMI greater than or equal to 37. Annual weight change over 10 years was higher in subjects who become diabetic compared with those who did not for all BMI<35. Relative to overweight people with stable weight, each kg of weight gained annually over 10 years was associated with a 49% increase in risk of developing diabetes in the subsequent 10 years. Each kg of weight lost annually over 10 years was associated with a 33% lower risk of diabetes in the subsequent 10 years. Conclusions-Weight gain was associated with substantially increased risk of diabetes among overweight adults, and even modest weight loss was associated with significantly reduced diabetes risk. Minor weight reductions may have major beneficial effects on subsequent diabetes risk in overweight adults at high risk of developing diabetes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available