4.7 Article

A single dose of nicotine enhances reward responsiveness in nonsmokers: Implications for development of dependence

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 63, Issue 11, Pages 1061-1065

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.09.015

Keywords

anhedonia; drug addiction; nicotine; nonsmokers; reward; reward responsiveness

Funding

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [K23 DA000510-03, K23 DA000510-02, K23 DA000510-05, K23 DA000510-01, K23 DA000510, K23 DA000510-04, 1K23DA00510] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH068376] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Tobacco smoking, driven by the addictive properties of nicotine, is the most prevalent preventable cause of death in the Western world. Accumulated evidence suggests that nicotine may increase appetitive responding for nondrug incentives in the environment. Methods: To test this hypothesis, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of the effect of a single dose of transdermal nicotine on reward responsiveness in 30 psychiatrically healthy nonsmokers. A novel signal detection task in which correct responses were differentially rewarded in a 3:1 ratio was used to assess the extent to which participants modulated their behavior as a function of reward. Results: Despite expected adverse effects such as nausea, nicotine significantly increased response bias toward the more frequently rewarded condition, at the expense of accuracy, independent of effects on attention or overall vigilance. Additionally, response bias on placebo was greater in participants who received nicotine in the first session, indicating that an effect of nicotine on reward responsiveness or reward-based learning persisted for at least 1 week. Conclusions: These findings suggest that a single dose of nicotine enhances response to non-drug-related rewards in the environment, with lasting effects. This effect may contribute to reinforcement of early smoking behavior and development of nicotine dependence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available