4.7 Article

Use of neuromelanin-sensitive MRI to distinguish schizophrenic and depressive patients and healthy individuals based on signal alterations in the substantia nigra and locus ceruleus

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 64, Issue 5, Pages 401-406

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.03.021

Keywords

depression; locus ceruleus; magnetic resonance imaging; neuromelanin; schizophrenia; substantia nigra

Funding

  1. Advanced Medical Science Research
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [17591290]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: We investigated alterations in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) and locus ceruleus (LC) in schizophrenic and depressive patients by using a neuromelanin-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique that enables direct visualization of these nuclei and examined whether this technique could distinguish between these disorders and healthy subjects. Methods: Using a neuromelanin-sensitive T1-weighted MRI technique, we examined 20 schizophrenia patients, 18 depressive patients, and 34 healthy control subjects. The signal intensities of the areas corresponding to the SNc and LC were measured, and the contrast ratios (CR) to the adjacent white matter were calculated. Results: The CR of the SNc was significantly higher in schizophrenic patients (22.6 +/- 5.6) than in depressive patients (19.2 +/- 4.7) and healthy control subjects (19.6 +/- 3.8), whereas the CR of the LC in depressive patients (7.7 +/- 2.4) was significantly lower than that in healthy control subjects (11.0 +/- 3.9) and schizophrenic patients (10.0 +/- 3.1). Further, the difference in the CR between the SNc and LC was significantly greater in schizophrenic patients (12.6 +/- 6.7) than in control subjects (8.6 +/- 4.1). Conclusions: Neuromelanin-sensitive MRI enables visualization of alterations in the SNc and LC that are observed in schizophrenia and depression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available