4.5 Article

The genetic structure of field populations of Rhynchosporium secalis from three continents suggests moderate gene flow and regular recombination

Journal

PHYTOPATHOLOGY
Volume 90, Issue 8, Pages 901-908

Publisher

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO.2000.90.8.901

Keywords

barley scald; genetic distance; population genetics

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) markers were used to compare the genetic structure of field populations of Rhynchosporium secalis from barley. A total of 543 isolates representing 8 field populations were sampled from Australia, California, Finland, and Norway. Gene and genotype diversity were high in all populations. Nei's average gene diversity across seven RFLP loci was 0.513. Hierarchical gene diversity analysis showed that 9% of the total genetic variability was distributed among continents, 4% was distributed among fields within continents, and 13% was distributed among collection stations within a field. The majority (74%) of genetic variability was distributed within collection areas of approximately 1 m(2) within fields. Gene flow appears to be significant on a regional scale but more restricted among continents; Allele frequencies were significantly different at several RFLP loci. Genetic distances were small among populations within regions and large between regions. Pairwise comparisons of genotype diversity in the populations revealed significant differences among populations that were related mainly to differences in sampling strategies. Isolates from Norway and Finland showed a lower copy hybridization pattern with probe pRS26. This probe functioned as a fingerprint probe for the California and Australian isolates. Seven out of the eight populations studied were at gametic equilibrium for RFLP loci, suggesting that R. secalis populations in Norway, Finland, and Australia undergo regular recombination, although a teleomorph has not yet been recognized.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available