4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Early effects of right ventricular volume overload on ventricular performance and β-adrenergic signaling

Journal

JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
Volume 120, Issue 2, Pages 342-349

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1067/mtc.2000.107278

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL56227, HL56205, HL09907] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Right ventricular dysfunction is a poorly understood but persistent clinical problem. This study was undertaken to evaluate ventricular performance and beta-adrenergic receptor signaling in a tricuspid regurgitation model of right ventricular overload. Methods: Seventeen dogs were chronically instrumented with epicardial dimension transducers. By means of the shell-subtraction model, right ventricular pressure-volume relationships were evaluated in normal and right ventricular overload states. Right ventricular chamber performance was quantified by the stroke work at an end-diastolic volume relationship, Results: Right ventricular volume overload caused a 28% +/- 11% and 31% +/- 9% decline in chamber performance acutely and at 1 week, respectively, whereas end-diastolic volume increased from 45 +/- 21 to 60 +/- 30 mt (P =.019). beta-Adrenergic receptor signaling in myocardial samples was assessed, examining adenylyl cyclase and G-protein-coupled receptor kinase activity, Stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity significantly decreased, and G-protein-coupled receptor kinase activity significantly increased in both left and right ventricular samples caused by increased levels of beta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1, No change in beta-adrenergic receptor density was seen at 1 week. Conclusions: Early right ventricular overload is associated with impaired right ventricular chamber contractility, dilation, and, importantly, a biventricular alteration of beta-adrenergic receptor signaling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available