4.1 Article

Quantification of mtDNA in single oocytes, polar bodies and subcellular components by real-time rapid cycle fluorescence monitored PCR

Journal

ZYGOTE
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages 209-215

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0967199400001003

Keywords

mitochondria; oocyte; quantification; rapid cycling; real-time PCR

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [R21 RR021881-03, R21 RR021881-02, R21 RR021881-01, R21 RR021881-04] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [R03 HD046553-02, R03 HD046553-02S1, R03 HD046553-03, R03 HD046553-01A1] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oocytes, in general, are greatly enriched in mitochondria to support higher rates of macromolecular synthesis and critical physiological processes characteristic of early development. An inability of these organelles to amplify and/or to accumulate ATP has been linked to developmental abnormality or arrest. The number of mitochondrial genomes present in mature mouse and human metaphase II oocytes was estimated by fluorescent rapid cycle DNA amplification, which is a highly sensitive technique ideally suited to quantitative mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) analysis in individual cells. A considerable degree of variability was observed between individual samples. An overall average of 1.59 x 10(5) and 3.14 x 10(5) mtDNA molecules were detected per mouse and human oocyte, respectively. Furthermore, the mtDNA copy number was examined in polar bodies and contrasted with the concentration in their corresponding oocytes. In addition, the density of mtDNA in a cytoplasmic sample was estimated in an attempt to determine the approximate number of mitochondria transferred during clinical cytoplasmic donation procedures as well as to develop a clinical tool for the assessment and selection of oocytes during in vitro fertilisation procedures. However, no correlation was identified between the mtDNA concentration in either polar bodies or cytoplasmic samples and their corresponding oocyte.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available