4.8 Article

Tumor necrosis factor α in the pathogenesis of human and murine fulminant hepatic failure

Journal

GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 119, Issue 2, Pages 446-460

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/gast.2000.9364

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background & Aims: The tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha/TNF receptor system is critical for liver development because hepatocytes undergo apoptosis if the antiapoptotic cascades resulting in RelA NF-kappa B activation are not effective. Therefore, we studied the role of TNF-alpha in fulminant hepatic failure (FHF) and developed a new therapeutic strategy, Methods: Serum levels and hepatic expression of TNF-alpha and both TNF receptors were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunohistochemistry. Adenoviral vectors were constructed expressing dominant-negative proteins interfering with intracellular TNF-alpha-dependent pathways. The relevance of these constructs was studied in primary mouse hepatocytes and in a murine model of FHF, Results: Serum levels of TNF-alpha and TNF receptors are significantly increased in FHF; this increase correlates with patient prognosis, In livers of patients with FHF, infiltrating mononuclear cells express high amounts of TNF-alpha and hepatocytes overexpress TNF receptor 1 (TNF-R1). Apoptotic hepatocytes are significantly increased in FHF, and there is a strong correlation with TNF-alpha expression, which is even more pronounced in areas of mononuclear infiltrates, In an in vivo FHF model, the Fas-associated death domain (FADD), adenovirus selectively blocked the intracellular pathway, leading to mitochondrial cytochrome c release, caspase-3 activation, and, thus, apoptosis of hepatocytes, Conclusions: The results show that the TNF-alpha/TNF-R1 system is involved in the pathogenesis of FHF in humans. Studies in this animal model indicate that FADD may serve as a molecular target to prevent liver cell death in vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available