4.2 Review

Floral shape mimicry and variation in sexually deceptive orchids with a shared pollinator

Journal

BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
Volume 106, Issue 3, Pages 469-481

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2012.01902.x

Keywords

deception; geometric morphometrics; Ichneumonidae; learning; Orchidaceae; plant-animal interactions; pollination

Funding

  1. Furniss Foundation/American Orchid Society
  2. Macquarie University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mimics can have both accurate mimicry and phenotypic variation if deception operates in multiple sensory modes. Australian Tongue orchids (Cryptostylis species) attract their sole pollinator, male Lissopimpla excelsa wasps (Ichneumonidae), by accurately mimicking the scent and colour of female L. excelsa wasps. To test for shape mimicry of female wasps, both traditional and geometric morphometric comparisons were performed with allopatric Cryptostylis ovata and the often sympatric Cryptostylis erecta, Cryptostylis leptochila, and Cryptostylis subulata. Although some floral parts accurately mimicked the female wasp, the overall floral shape differed dramatically among orchid species. The function (if any) of this interspecific shape variation is unknown, although it does not cause character displacement of pollen attachment locations to reduce interspecific pollen transfer. Analyses showed that floral parts involved in pollinia transfer were similarly shaped for three of the four Cryptostylis species and all attach their pollinia to the same location on the pollinator's abdomen. Shape may interact with pollinator behaviour: in the field, pollination rates doubled when two Cryptostylis species were present, regardless of orchid abundances. Perhaps variation in shape hinders pollinator recognition and the avoidance of orchids, similar to scent and colour variation in other sexually deceptive orchid systems. (C) 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 106, 469481.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available