4.5 Article

Genetic diversity and population structure of the serpentine endemic Calystegia collina (Convolvulaceae) in northern California

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY
Volume 87, Issue 8, Pages 1138-1146

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.2307/2656650

Keywords

Calystegia collina; clonal plant; Convolvulaceae; habitat fragmentation; genetic diversity; population structure; serpentine endemic; somatic mutation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We used enzyme electrophoresis to evaluate genetic diversity in 32 populations of Calystegia collina, a clonal plant species endemic to serpentine outcrops in northern California (USA). Of 34 loci examined 56% were polymorphic, but on average only 17% were polymorphic within local populations. Neither the total number of alleles nor the number of multilocus genotypes differed significantly between populations in small vs. large serpentine outcrops. Genetic and geographic distances between populations were positively correlated, but this relationship was not significantly affected by the isolation of serpentine outcrops. Populations were highly differentiated (F-st = 0.417) and little genetic variation was explained by geographic region or serpentine outcrop. Observed heterozygosity within populations almost always exceeded Hardy-Weinberg expectations. In many populations, all 30 sample ramets were uniformly heterozygous at one or more loci yet were genetically variable at other loci. These results imply that many C. collina populations originate from one or a few genetic founders, with little recruitment from seeds. Genetic variation within uniformly heterozygous populations must be the product of multiple, closely related founders or somatic mutations within the population. We conclude that vegetative reproduction, perhaps coupled with somatic mutation, helps maintain genetic diversity in these isolated but long-lived populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available