4.2 Article

Multiple cryptic genetic units in Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytinae): evidence from microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA sequence data

Journal

BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
Volume 101, Issue 1, Pages 113-129

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01483.x

Keywords

Bayesian analysis; coffee pest; genetic structure; molecular phylogenetics; pest management; population differentiation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hypothenemus hampei is the most important insect pest of coffee and has spread to most coffee-growing countries worldwide. There have been very few studies and none have addressed the population genetics of the beetle using microsatellite markers. In the present study, 683 individuals collected from 37 locations in 18 countries worldwide were screened at nine polymorphic microsatellite loci. Sixty-five out the 683 and six additional individuals were analyzed on a 400-bp fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I gene. Bayesian clustering analysis and phylogenetic approaches were used to infer the genetic structure of H. hampei over the sampling that encompassed almost all its range. Microsatellite markers made it possible to achieve sufficiently significant power for the delineation of five morphocryptic evolutionary units. Supported by 27 new COI haplotypes, an unexpected considerably high level of genetic differentiation and genetic divergence was revealed between five geographically delineated clusters. Both markers and approaches showed that the clusters included specimens from (1) Ethiopia, (2) Kenya and Uganda, (3) Brazil, (4) Central America excluding Jamaica, and (5) all samples from Asia, West Africa, and Jamaica. These findings clearly suggest the existence of a 'species complex in H. hampei'. (C) 2010 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2010, 101, 113-129.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available