4.2 Article

Sex-specific evolution of bite performance in Liolaemus lizards (Iguania: Liolaemidae): the battle of the sexes

Journal

BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
Volume 101, Issue 2, Pages 461-475

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01519.x

Keywords

diet; ecomorphology; interspecific variation; natural selection; sexual differences; sexual selection

Funding

  1. Musee National d'Histoire Naturelle (Paris, France) [PICT 01205]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although differential selective pressures on males and females of the same species may result in sex-specific evolutionary trajectories, comparative studies of adaptive radiations have largely neglected within-species variation. In this study, we explore the potential effects of natural selection, sexual selection, or a combination of both, on bite performance in males and females of 19 species of Liolaemus lizards. More specifically, we study the evolution of bite performance, and compare evolutionary relationships between the variation in head morphology, bite performance, ecological variation and sexual dimorphism between males and females. Our results suggest that in male Liolaemus, the variation in bite force is at least partly explained by the variation in the degree of sexual dimorphism in head width (i.e. our estimate of the intensity of sexual selection), and neither bite force nor the morphological variables were correlated with diet (i.e. our proxy for natural selection). On the contrary, in females, the variation in bite force and head size can, to a certain extent, be explained by variation in diet. These results suggest that whereas in males, sexual selection seems to be operating on bite performance, in the case of females, natural selection seems to be the most likely and most important selective pressure driving the variation in head size. (C) 2010 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2010, 101, 461-475.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available