4.2 Article

Reproductive hierarchies in the African allodapine bee Allodapula dichroa (Apidae; Xylocopinae) and ancestral forms of sociality

Journal

BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
Volume 97, Issue 3, Pages 520-530

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2009.01236.x

Keywords

Allodapini; alloparental care; benefits to group living; body size; caste evolution; developmental ground plan; facultative social behaviour; reproductive queuing; sex allocation

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [A19942062]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The social organization of allodapine bees has been described in detail for most genera, although there remains a notable gap for one major lineage, the genus Allodapula. Here, we provide the first detailed study of social organization in Allodapula dichroa. Colony sizes are small and the frequency of cooperative nesting is low compared with other allodapine taxa, but there is very clear evidence for reproductive differentiation among adult nestmates. Reproductively dominant females tend to be larger than their nestmates and have much higher levels of wing wear, suggesting that they perform most foraging activities. Multi-female colonies have: (1) lower rates of complete brood absence, suggesting a substantial benefit to cooperative nesting; and (2) larger numbers of brood, suggesting that the presence of a second adult female leads to a greater reproductive output. These data suggest a major phylogenetic split in the form of social organization within the allodapines. In the genus Macrogalea (sister clade to all other allodapines), body size does not preclude young females from laying eggs, and there appears to be, at most, weak reproductive queues. However, in most other allodapines, reproductive hierarchies are prominent and younger and/or smaller females queue for reproductive opportunities, adopt permanently subordinate roles, or disperse. Interestingly, the most common forms of reproductive hierarchies in allodapines do not involve subordinates undertaking foraging roles before reproduction, but instead involve the delaying of both reproduction and foraging. This has implications for the understanding of suggested developmental ground plans in the early stages of social evolution. (C) 2009 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2009, 97, 520-530.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available