3.8 Article

Gastric cancer:: which patients benefit from systematic lymphadenectomy?

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages 498-505

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1053/ejso.1999.0930

Keywords

gastric cancer; curative resection; systematic lymphadenectomy (sla); long-term survival

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of systematic lymphadenectomy (SLA) in curative resected gastric cancer patients with respect to long-term survival, peri-operative morbidity and mortality. Methods: We reviewed our prospectively gathered database of 309 resected gastric cancer patients and analysed the outcome of 185 R-o-resected patients (60%) with respect to peri-operative morbidity, mortality and long-term survival by comparing 81 patients resected with SLA (D-2-group) versus 104 patients resected without SLA (D-1-group). Results: Overall 5-year survival rates of R-o-resected patients (n = 173: exclusion of peri-operative mortality) amounted to 49% and did not differ significantly between D-2- and D-1-groups (53% ys 47%; P=0.344). Nevertheless, subgroups of patients taking a benefit from SLA could be defined. Gastric cancer patients without LN metastases (pT(x) pN(o); n=78) and patients with LN metastases only in perigastric lymph nodes (pT(x) pN(1); n=34) showed a significantly better long-term prognosis when SLA was performed (84% vs 51%,P=0.001). Regarding peri-operative morbidity (38% vs 39%) and mortality (6% in each case) we could not find any differences between the D-2- and D-1-groups. Conclusions: We conclude that SLA is able to improve long-term survival for some tumour stages. Therefore SLA should be recommended as a standard procedure in all gastric cancer patients resected with curative intention. (C) 2000 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available