4.2 Article

Wing morphology is related to host plants in cactophilic Drosophila gouveai and Drosophila antonietae (Diptera, Drosophilidae)

Journal

BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
Volume 95, Issue 4, Pages 655-665

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2008.00980.x

Keywords

cactus; geometric morphometrics; morphological evolution; phenotypic plasticity

Funding

  1. ANPCyT
  2. Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA) from Argentina
  3. Universidade de Sao Paulo (USP)
  4. CNPq
  5. FAPESP
  6. FINEP from Brazil
  7. CAPES/SECyT [071/04]
  8. CONICET (Argentina)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A central issue in evolutionary biology is to understand the mechanisms promoting morphological evolution during speciation. In a previous study, we showed that the Neotropical cactophilic sibling species Drosophila gouveai and Drosophila antonietae can be reared in media prepared with their presumptive natural host plants (Pilosocereus machrisis and Cereus hildmaniannus) and that egg to adult viability is not independent of the cactus host. In the present study, we investigate the effects of ecological and genetic factors on interspecific divergence in wing morphology, in relation to the pattern of wing venation and phenotypic plasticity in D. gouveai and D. antonietae, by means of the comparative analysis of isofemale lines reared in the two cactus hosts. The species differed significantly in wing size and shape, although specific differences were mainly localized in a particular portion of the wing. We detected significant variation in form among lines, which was not independent of the breeding cactus, suggesting the presence of genetic variation for phenotypic plasticity and wing shape variation in both species. We discuss the results considering the plausible role of host plant use in the evolutionary history of cactophilic Drosophila inhabiting the arid zones of South America. (C) 2008 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2008, 95, 655-665.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available