4.7 Article

String or M theory axion as a quintessence

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 62, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.62.043509

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A slow-rolling scalar field (Q=quintessence) with potential energy V(Q)similar to(3 x 10(-3) eV)(4) has been proposed as the origin of an accelerating universe at present. We investigate the effective potential of Q in the framework of a supergravity model including the quantum corrections induced by generic (nonrenormalizable) couplings of Q to the gauge and charged matter multiplets. It is argued that the Kahler potential, superpotential, and gauge kinetic functions of the underlying supergravity model are required to be invariant under the variation of Q with an extremely fine accuracy in order to provide a workings quintessence potential. Applying these results for string or M theory, we point out that the heterotic M theory or type-I string axion clin be a plausible candidate for quintessence if (i) it does not couple to the instanton number of gauge interactions not weaker than those of the standard model and (ii) the modulus partner Re(Z) of the periodic quintessence axion Im(Z)=Im(Z)+1 has a large vacuum expectation value: Re(Z)similar to(1/2 pi)ln(m(3/2)(2)M(Planck)(2)/V-Q). It is stressed that such a large Re(Z) gives the gauge unification scale at around the phenomenologically favored value 3 x 10(16) GeV. To provide an accelerating universe, the quintessence axion should be near the top of its effective potential at present, which requires severe fine tuning of the initial condition of Q and (Q)over dot in the early universe. We discuss a late time inflation scenario based on the modular and CP invariance of the moduli effective potential, yielding the required initial condition in a natural manner if the Kahler metric of the quintessence axion superfield receives a sizable nonperturbative contribution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available