4.5 Article

Multi-epitope schistosome vaccine candidates tested for protective immunogenicity in mice

Journal

VACCINE
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages 103-113

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0264-410X(00)00165-1

Keywords

Schistosoma mansoni; synthetic peptide; polyepitope; polytope; polymer; DNA synthesis; expression; purification; immunisation; ELISA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The major challenge in the development of anti-schistosome vaccines is to use defined antigens to stimulate an appropriate immune response that leads to resistance. Several promising candidate vaccine antigens including the glycolytic enzyme triosephosphate isomerase (SmTPI), a 28 kDa glutathione-S-transferase (Sm28), the myofibrilar protein paramyosin (Sm97), an integral membrane protein (Sm23) and calpain (Smcalpain) have been characterised and their primary sequences derived for Schistosoma mansoni. Furthermore, sequences are available For synthetic peptides mimicking epitopes on these molecules capable of inducing schistosmne-specific T- and B-cell responses. These schistosome vaccine candidates have generally been tested with varying degrees of success as single components, with only one report of the use of a multivalent antigen or multi-epitope approach. We describe the assembly of multiple defined and different epitopes of S. mansoni into a variety of single covalent structures; these included a DNA vaccine encoding different epitopes in tandem, the polyprotein itself that is encoded by this DNA acid branched synthetic peptide epitope-based polymers in which the individual epitopes are pendant from an inert backbone. Each of the vaccine constructs examined, with the exception of the DNA vaccine, generated antibodies that were capable of binding to a tandem sequence of the epitopes. Although these results were encouraging, none of the constructs protected animals from subsequent challenge infection, indicating that the immune responses elicited were inadequate or inappropriate for parasite killing in vivo. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available