4.4 Article

Bird demographic responses to predator removal programs

Journal

BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages 3839-3859

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-010-9776-x

Keywords

Eradication benefits; Island restoration; Invasive predator; Population recovery; Predator control

Funding

  1. NSF [DEB-0553768]
  2. University of California
  3. Santa Barbara
  4. State of California
  5. Commonwealth Environment Research Facilities Programme
  6. Government of Australia
  7. Alcoa Foundation
  8. Switzer Foundation
  9. Resources for the Future
  10. Cornell University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Invasive predators pose a significant risk to bird populations worldwide. Humans have a long history of removing predators from ecosystems; current island restoration actions typically focus on the removal of invasive predators, such as non-native rodents, from seabird breeding islands. While not overly abundant, the results of predator removal studies provide valuable information on the demographic response of birds, and can assist conservation practitioners with prioritizing invasive predator removal projects. We review such studies focusing on observed demographic responses of bird populations to predator removal campaigns and whether ecological factors are useful in predicting those responses. From the 800+ predator removal programs indentified, a small fraction (n = 112) reported demographic responses of bird populations. Change in productivity was the most commonly reported response, which on average increased by 25.3% (2.5 SE) with predator removal. The best supported model for predicting the change in productivity from predator removal incorporated bird body mass, egg mass, predator type, nest type and an interaction term for body mass and nest type (AIC(c) weight = 0.457). The predicted percent increase in productivity resulting from hypothetical predator removal ranged from 16.9 to 63.0% (mean = 45.0, 5.6 SE), and was lowest for large, surface nesting birds such as albatrosses. The predicted increase in productivity resulting from predator removal alone was insufficient to reverse the predicted population decline for 30-67% of bird species considered, suggesting that in many cases, removal of predators must be performed in combination with other conservation actions in order to ensure a stable or increasing population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available