4.8 Article

Inducible expression of double-stranded RNA directs specific genetic interference in Drosophila

Journal

CURRENT BIOLOGY
Volume 10, Issue 16, Pages 957-963

Publisher

CURRENT BIOLOGY LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00631-X

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The introduction of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) can selectively interfere with gene expression in a wide Variety of organisms, providing an ideal approach for functional genomics. Although this method has been used in Drosophila, it has been limited to studies of embryonic gene function. Only inefficient effects have been seen at later stages of development. Results: When expressed under the control of a heat-inducible promoter, dsRNA interfered efficiently and specifically with gene expression during larval and prepupal development in Drosophila. Expression of dsRNA corresponding to the EcR ecdysone receptor gene generated detects in larval molting and metamorphosis, resulting in animals that failed to pupariate or prepupae that died with defects in larval tissue cell death and adult leg formation. In contrast, expression of dsRNA corresponding to the coding region of the beta FTZ-F1 orphan nuclear receptor had no effect on puparium formation, but led to an arrest of prepupal development, generating more severe lethal phenotypes than those seen with a weak beta FTZ-F1 loss-of-function allele. Animals that expressed either EcR or beta FTZ-F1 dsRNA showed defects in the expression of corresponding target genes, indicating that the observed developmental defects are caused by disruption of the genetic cascades that control the onset of metamorphosis. Conclusions: These results confirm and extend our understanding of EcR and beta FTZ-F1 function. They also demonstrate that dsRNA expression can inactivate Drosophila gene function at later stages of development, providing a new tool for functional genomic studies in Drosophila.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available