4.6 Article

Overexpression of eukaryotic elongation factor 1 alpha-2 is associated with poorer prognosis in patients with gastric cancer

Journal

JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 141, Issue 7, Pages 1265-1275

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-014-1897-7

Keywords

Gastric cancer; Eukaryotic elongation factor 1 alpha-2 (eEF1A2); Immunohistochemistry; Overexpression; Prognostic significance

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30871207, 81270454]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province [12070403086]
  3. Key Project of Education Department of Anhui Province [KJ2008A154]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Eukaryotic elongation factor 1 alpha-2 (eEF1A2) is a protein translation factor involved in protein synthesis. It is overexpressed in various cancers, which indicates potential vital functions in tumorigenesis and progression. Our study aims to investigate the expression levels of eEF1A2 in gastric cancer and its roles in clinical practice. A total of 129 patients with pathologically confirmed gastric cancer and 24 normal controls were recruited for this study. The expression levels of eEF1A2 in gastric cancer and normal tissues were evaluated by tissue microarrays, quantitative real-time PCR, and western blot analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox's proportional hazards model were used in survival analysis. Compared with corresponding controls, gastric cancer specimens had significantly increased expressions of eEF1A2 at mRNA and protein levels (both P < 0.05). Moreover, multivariate analysis confirmed that overexpression of eEF1A2 was a significant and independent indicator for predicting poor prognosis of gastric cancer. Our results showed for the first time that overexpression of eEF1A2 was correlated with worse outcomes in gastric cancer patients, suggesting its critical roles in the carcinogenesis of gastric cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available