4.7 Article

Evaluation of the oxidase like activity of nanoceria and its application in colorimetric assays

Journal

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 885, Issue -, Pages 140-147

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2015.04.052

Keywords

Nanoceria particles; Oxidase mimic; Dopamine; Catechol; Colorimetric assay

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [0954919]
  2. David A. Walsh Fellowship
  3. Division Of Materials Research
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0954919] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanomaterial-based enzyme mimics have attracted considerable interest in chemical analysis as alternative catalysts to natural enzymes. However, the conditions in which such particles can replace biological catalysts and their selectivity and reactivity profiles are not well defined. This work explored the oxidase like properties of nanoceria particles in the development of colorimetric assays for the detection of dopamine and catechol. Selectivity of the system with respect to several phenolic compounds, the effect of interferences and real sample analysis are discussed. The conditions of use such as buffer composition, selectivity, pH, reaction time and particle type are defined. Detection limits of 1.5 and 0.2 mu M were obtained with nanoceria for dopamine and catechol. The same assay could be used as a general sensing platform for the detection of other phenolics. However, the sensitivity of the method varies significantly with the particle type, buffer composition, pH and with the structure of the phenolic compound. The results demonstrate that nanoceria particles can be used for the development of cost effective and sensitive methods for the detection of these compounds. However, the selection of the particle system and experimental conditions is critical for achieving high sensitivity. Recommendations are provided on the selection of the particle system and reaction conditions to maximize the oxidase like activity of nanoceria. (C)2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available