4.7 Article

Development and validation of an instrument to assess child dietary fat intake

Journal

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 214-224

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0701

Keywords

child nutrition; nutrition assessment; diet; total fat; dietary cholesterol; saturated fatty acid

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. A brief dietary assessment instrument to assess dietary intakes of total fat, saturated fatty acids (SFA), and cholesterol in young children was developed and validated. Methods. Young children and their parent or primary caretaker were recruited from a general primary care health center and local Head Start programs. Dietary records, entered and analyzed using the Minnesota Nutrition Data System, were used to calculate children's mean dietary intakes. Stepwise linear regression analysis was used to select questionnaire items that best predicted total fat, SFA, and dietary cholesterol intakes. Results. This yielded a 17-item Child Dietary Fat Questionnaire (CDFQ); 9 questions correlated with total fat intake (r = 0.68, P < 0.0001); 15 questions correlated with SFA intake (r = 0.75, P < 0.0001); and 4 questions correlated with dietary cholesterol intake (r = 0.57, P < 0.0001). The test-retest reliabilities of the CDFQ in predicting children's dietary intakes of total fat, SFA, and cholesterol were 0.41, 0.66, and 0.64, respectively. The criterion-based validity of the CDFQ, evaluated against 4 days of dietary records, yielded correlations of 0.54 (P < 0.0001) for total fat, 0.36 (P < 0.01) for SFA, and 0.55 (P < 0.0001) for dietary cholesterol intake. Conclusions. The 17-item CDFQ is a brief, easy-to-use dietary assessment instrument that could be used to identify children with high, as well as low, dietary intakes of total fat, SFA, and/or cholesterol. (C) 2000 American Health Foundation and Academic Press.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available