4.8 Article

A 39-kb sequence around a blackbird Mhc class II gene:: Ghost of selection past and songbird genome architecture

Journal

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages 1384-1395

Publisher

SOC MOLECULAR BIOLOGY EVOLUTION
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026421

Keywords

Mhc; microsatellites; introns; CpG islands; balancing selection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To gain an understanding of the evolution and genomic context of avian major histocompatibility complex (Mhc) genes, we sequenced a 38.8-kb Mhc-bearing cosmid insert from a red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus). The DNA sequence, the longest yet retrieved from a bird other than a chicken, provides a detailed view of the process of gene duplication, divergence, and degeneration (birth and death) in the avian Mhc, as well as a glimpse into major noncoding features of a songbird genome. The peptide-binding region (PBR) of the single Mhc class II B gene in this region, Agph-DAB2, is almost devoid of polymorphism, and a still-segregating single-base-pair deletion and other features suggest that it is nonfunctional. Agph-DAB2 is estimated to have diverged about 40 MYA from a previously characterized and highly polymorphic blackbird Mhc gene, Aph-DAB1, and is therefore younger than most mammalian Mile paralogs and arose relatively late in avian evolution. Despite its nonfunctionality, Agph-DAB2 shows very high levels of nonsynonymous divergence from Agph-DAB1 and from reconstructed ancestral sequences in antigen-binding PER codons-a strong indication of a period of adaptive divergence preceding loss of function. We also found that the region sequenced contains very few other unambiguous genes, a partial Mhc-class LI gene fragment, and a paucity of simple-sequence and other repeats. Thus, this sequence exhibits some of the genomic streamlining expected for avian as compared with mammalian genomes, but is not as densely packed with functional genes as is the chicken Mhc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available