4.6 Article

The development and multiple uses of a standardised bioassay method to select hypocrealean fungi for biological control of aphids

Journal

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL
Volume 46, Issue 2, Pages 242-255

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.03.006

Keywords

entomopathogenic fungi; bioassay; Beauveria bassiana; Lecanicillium longisporum; Paecilomyces fumosoroseus; Metarhizium anisopliae; Aphis fabae; Acyrthosiphon pisum; Myzus persicae; Rhopalosiphum padi; Sitobion avenue; Metopolophium dirliodum; virulence; host-pathogen interactions

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [CEH010021] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A technically standardised bioassay method was designed, evaluated and used to assess virulence and host range of hypocrealean fungi against aphids. A track mounted sprayer was used to apply conidia because hand held versions of the same sprayer can be used for field applications, thereby allowing the outcome from laboratory experiments to predict activity in the field accurately. Eighteen fungal isolates were assessed in single concentration bioassays against the black bean aphid Aphis fabae Scopoli. Isolates comprised commercially available mycoinsecticides (based on Beauveria bassiana and Lecanicillium longisporum) and isolates of B. bassiana, Lecanicillium spp., Paecilomyces fumosoroseus and Metarhizium anisopliae. Aphid mortality was in excess of 80% for 15 isolates, and HRI 1.72 (L. longipsorum), Z11 (P. fumosoroseus), Mycotech strain GHA (B. bassiana) and ARSEF 2879 (R bassiana) were studied further. Multiple concentration bioassays identified HRI 1.72 as the most virulent isolate against A. fabae with significantly smaller LC50 and LT50 values compared to other isolates. A precise LC50 value (2.95 x 10(2) conidia ml(-1)) was calculated for HRI 1. 72 using a second multiple concentration assay with smaller concentrations of conidia. The four isolates were applied at a single concentration (I x 108 conidia ml(-1)) against Myzus persicae, A. fabae, Acyrthosiphon pisum, Metopolophium dirhodum, Sitobion avenae and Rhopalosiphum padi. A ranking of aphid susceptibility was obtained, such that S. avenae > M. persicae, A. pisum, A. fabae > R padi. Results indicate the importance of standardising bioassay methods to reduce bioassay variability without compromising the ability to use the bioassay to investigate fungus-host interactions under varying abiotic and biotic conditions. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available