4.7 Article

Animal diversity declines with broad-scale homogenization of canopy cover in African savannas

Journal

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
Volume 226, Issue -, Pages 54-62

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.07.020

Keywords

Birds; Bats; Community composition; Functional traits; Terrestrial small mammals; African elephant

Funding

  1. University of Florida's Institute of Food and Agricultural Science
  2. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch project [FLA-WEC-005125]
  3. Nsasani Trust, All-Out Africa
  4. Savannah Research Center
  5. NSF IRES [1459882]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Savannas are increasingly threatened by anthropogenic forces that are causing broad-scale directional shifts in woody vegetation that homogenizes their structure. Yet, whether animal communities respond consistently to changes in woody vegetation in savannas, particularly in terms of the effects of spatial scale, remains poorly understood. We addressed this gap by testing for changes in birds, bats and terrestrial small mammals across a gradient of woody cover in the savannas of southeastern Africa for two years at multiple spatial scales. We found that homogenization of vegetation structure corresponded with decreases in animal richness, diversity and functional diversity. Additionally, metrics of animal diversity declined at opposing ends of a canopy cover gradient (< 10% and > 65%), where we found distinctly different animal assemblages. These patterns were consistently more pronounced on a broader grid scale (30.25 ha) when compared with the plot scale (0.25 ha). The broad-scale reductions in the diversity and functions of animals observed may be indicative of reductions in the resilience, stability and ecosystem function of tropical savannas. Our results suggest that conservation and management aimed at promoting heterogeneity at broad scales may be critical for maintaining diversity and functionality in savannas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available