4.7 Article

Mountaintop removal mining reduces stream salamander occupancy and richness in southeastern Kentucky (USA)

Journal

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
Volume 180, Issue -, Pages 115-121

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.09.040

Keywords

Amphibians; Appalachia; Coal mining; Community; Valley fill

Funding

  1. Kentucky Society of Natural History
  2. Department of Forestry
  3. University of Kentucky
  4. McIntire-Stennis Cooperative Forestry Research Program [1001968]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mountaintop removal mining with valley fills (MTR/VF) is a ubiquitous form of land conversion in central Appalachia, USA and threatens the integrity of stream ecosystems. We investigated the effects of MTR/VF on stream salamander occupancy and overall community composition in southeastern Kentucky by conducting area constrained active searches for salamanders within first-order streams located in mature forest (i.e., control streams) and those impacted by MTR/VF. We found high mean species occupancy across 5 species at control streams, ranging from 0.73 (95% CI 0.41 to 0.96) to 0.90 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.98). Occupancy was lower at MTR/VF streams, with mean estimated occupancy probability ranging from 0.23 (95% CI 0.04 to 0.51) to 0.62 (95% CI 0.36 to 0.86). Additionally, the mean species richness for MTR/VF streams was 2.27 (+/- 1.27 SD) whereas richness was 4.67 (+/- 0.65 SD) for control streams. Numerous mechanisms may be responsible for decreased occupancy and species richness at MTR/VF streams, although water chemistry may be particularly important. Indeed, mean specific conductance was 30 times greater, sulfate (SO4) levels were 70 times greater, and concentrations of dissolved ions (Ca, Mg, K, Na) were greater in MTR/VF streams than in control streams. Our results indicate that MTR/VF operations lead to significant decreases in salamander occupancy and species richness. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available