4.7 Article

Effects of contextual processing on visual conditional associative learning in schizophrenia

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 48, Issue 5, Pages 406-414

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3223(00)00930-6

Keywords

schizophrenia; conditional associative learning; memory; context

Funding

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [MH40279] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: We adapted visual conditional associative learning paradigms to assess the contextual processing deficit model of schizophrenic cognitive impairment proposed by J.D. Cohen and D. Servan-Schreiber in 1992. In this task subjects learn the associations between four sets of stimuli through the use of feedback. We administered two experimental conditional associative learning conditions: in one, the eight stimuli used to make Sour pairs were all different; in the other, the pairs were made from different combinations of four identical stimuli, requiring the use of contextual information to mediate correct performance. Two additional associative learning tasks were administered where subjects generated the stimulus pairings or observed the experimenter form the pairs, eliminating the need to learn from feedback. Methods: We tested 37 patients with schizophrenia and 20 healthy control subjects in each conditional associative learning task condition. Results: Patients demonstrated significant impairments on all four conditional associative learning tasks. The demand to process contextual information did not differentially impact patient performance. Patients were better able to learn associations if they generated or observed the pairings rather than utilized feedback to guide learning. Conclusions: Patients with schizophrenia demonstrate pronounced deficits in the ability to utilize feedback to guide learning. We found no evidence of an additional deficit in processing of contextual information. (C) 2000 Society of Biological Psychiatry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available