4.7 Article

Genetic rescue versus outbreeding depression in Vallisneria americana: Implications for mixing seed sources for restoration

Journal

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
Volume 167, Issue -, Pages 203-214

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.08.012

Keywords

Chesapeake Bay; Inbreeding; Local adaptation; Plant population restoration; Relatedness; Submersed aquatic vegetation

Funding

  1. Washington Biologists' Field Club
  2. Maryland SeaGrant
  3. UMD College Park
  4. UMCES Appalachian Laboratory
  5. US Environmental Protection Agency

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The selection of seed stock for restoration remains a complex issue. Using local stock reduces the chances of outbreeding depression or genetic dilution, whereas mixing sources may increase diversity and counteract inbreeding depression. Evaluation of these opposing approaches remains difficult when planning a restoration project but is needed to increase chances of long-term population persistence. We evaluated seed production and germination success of seeds from controlled reproductive crosses of the submersed aquatic plant Vallisneria americana (wild celery) collected from populations throughout the Chesapeake Bay. We assessed differences in seeds, capsules, and germination success in three types of crosses: (1) individuals within-populations, (2) among-populations but within-genetically differentiated regions, and (3) among-regions. We observed population level differences in within-population and among-region crosses. Levels of genetic relatedness among individuals, genetic diversity within populations, or differentiation across populations did not predict reproductive success. Our data show that mixing sources from different populations and regions has both benefits and drawbacks. Thus, minimizing the risks of outbreeding and inbreeding depression, presented as a mostly dichotomous issue in the restoration literature, is not an either-or issue in V. americana. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available