4.4 Article

Evidence for contribution of tripartite hemolysin BL, phosphatidylcholine-preferring phospholipase C, and collagenase to virulence of Bacillus cereus endophthalmitis

Journal

INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
Volume 68, Issue 9, Pages 5269-5276

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.68.9.5269-5276.2000

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NEI NIH HHS [EY10308-02] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bacillus cereus causes a highly fulminant endophthalmitis which usually results in blindness. We previously concluded that hemolysin BL (HBL), a tripartite necrotizing pore-forming toxin, is a probable endophthalmitis virulence factor because it is highly toxic to retinal tissue in vitro and in vivo. We also determined that B. cereus produces additional retinal toxins that might contribute to virulence. Here we fractionated crude B. cereus culture supernatant by anion-exchange chromatography and found that in vitro retinal toxicity was also associated with phosphatidylcholine-preferring phospholipase C (PC-PLC). The pure enzyme also caused retinal necrosis in vivo. We showed that phosphatidylinositol-specific PLC and sphingomyelinase were nontoxic and that two hemolysins, cereolysin O and a novel hemolysin designated hemolysin IV, were marginally toxic in vitro. The histopathology of experimental septic endophthalmitis in rabbits mimicked the pathology produced by pure HBL, and both HBL and PC-PLC were detected at toxic concentrations in infected vitreous fluid. Bacterial cells were first seen associated with the posterior margin of the lens and eventually mere located throughout the lens cortex. Detection of collagenase in the vitreous humor suggested that infiltration was facilitated by the break-down of the protective collagen lens capsule by that enzyme. This work supports our conclusion that HBL contributes to B. cereus virulence and implicates PC-PLC and collagenase as additional virulence factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available