4.7 Article

Conservation of amphibians in Borneo: Relative value of secondary tropical forest and non-forest habitats

Journal

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
Volume 152, Issue -, Pages 136-144

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.03.023

Keywords

Amphibian; Rainforest; Southeast Asia; Oil palm; Conservation; Deforestation

Funding

  1. HUTAN, Zoos Victoria
  2. Danau Girang Field Centre

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The impact of degradation of Southeast Asian rainforests and conversion to oil palm plantations on amphibians is unknown. To assess the relativevalue of secondary forests, oil palm plantations and other non-forest habitats for amphibianconservation, we evaluated amphibian species richness and assemblage composition in secondary lowland forests, compared with oil palm plantations and other non-forest habitats, along the Lower Kinabatangan River, eastern Sabah, Malaysia. Secondary forests retained a large proportion of amphibian species known from lowland primary rainforests. Species richness was higher in secondary forest habitats compared to oil palm plantations and other non-forest habitats. Secondary forests retained a much higher proportion of endemic species than non-forest habitats. We found strong differentiation between the frog assemblages in forest, non-forest and plantation sites. Oil palm plantations retained no microhylid species, few arboreal species and were dominated by habitat generalist and human commensal species. Our findings suggest that, despite a history of disturbance and degradation, remnant secondary forests may play an important role in conserving lowland amphibian diversity. In contrast, oil palm plantations have comparatively low conservationvalue for amphibians. Our study highlights the value of setting aside adequate areas of representative forest habitats within agricultural landscapes in order to conserve biodiversity, even when those remnants have a history of prior disturbance. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available