4.7 Review

Ensemble models of habitat suitability relate chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) conservation to forest and landscape dynamics in Western Africa

Journal

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
Volume 143, Issue 2, Pages 416-425

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.11.007

Keywords

Deforestation; Primates; Guinea-Bissau; Remote sensing

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia [POCTI/BIA-BDE/57965/2004, SFRH/BD/24560/2005]
  2. [USFWS GA-0155]
  3. [POCI/Ant/57434/2004]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/24560/2005, POCI/ANT/57434/2004] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pan troglodytes verus is considered one of the most endangered primates in the world due to habitat loss or degradation, and it is considered extinct in several regions of West-Africa. This study aims at developing a model that predicts habitat suitability for chimpanzee under different land cover scenarios and supports a multi-temporal analysis of the recent habitat evolution in southern Guinea-Bissau. The model, built using a maximum entropy framework, is spatially explicit, uses eco-geographic variables derived from landscape compositional, structural and functional attributes, and is based on nest location data collected in the field. The results show that the developed model has good levels of reliability and the map produced through its application reveals a current extension of 752 km(2) of adequate habitat in a 2723 km(2) study area. Forest related EGVs (ecogeographical variables) had the higher importance for the model production. Habitat suitability maps produced for three dates in the last three decades show that there has been a marked decrease in habitat extension and in connectivity to neighbouring regions. We analyse the implications of these results in possible strategies for the conservation of chimpanzees in Guinea-Bissau. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available